Pentamidine: a drug to consider re-purposing in the targeted treatment of multi-drug resistant bacterial infections?

Pentamidine: a drug to consider re-purposing in the targeted treatment of multi-drug resistant bacterial infections?

David C. Bean1, David W. Wareham2

1Faculty of Science & Technology, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia; 2Antimicrobial Research Group, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, London, UK

Correspondence to: David W. Wareham. Blizard Building, 4 Newark Street, Whitechapel, London E1 2AT, UK. Email:

Provenance: This is a Guest Editorial commissioned by the Executive Editor Bing Gu (Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China).

Comment on: Stokes JM, MacNair CR, Ilyas B, et al. Pentamidine sensitizes Gram-negative pathogens to antibiotics and overcomes acquired colistin resistance. Nat Microbiol 2017;2:17028.

Received: 14 June 2017; Accepted: 24 June 2017; Published: 27 July 2017.

doi: 10.21037/jlpm.2017.06.18

The recent emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance (1) highlights a new problem in the development of bacterial antimicrobial resistance. Colistin, while an old antibiotic, is increasingly turned to as a “drug of last resort” for many recalcitrant Gram-negative infections. With the efficacy of this drug now compromised, the spread of pan-resistant organisms is a very real threat. To meet this challenge clinicians are seeking new treatment options, however with a drug development pipeline that is virtually dry, an urgent rethinking of how we employ our existing arsenal of antibiotics is required to deal with this problem. Un-orthodox combinations of existing antimicrobial drugs are increasingly being used, often with little rationale on how such combinations are selected beyond the thinking that ‘more is likely to be better’ (2). There is a clear need for a precision medicine approach that combines robust laboratory testing methods with effective dosing strategies for individual patients.

The recent paper of Stokes et al. (3) is notable in two ways. Firstly, the repurposing of pentamidine for the treatment of multi-drug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative infections and secondly, the rationale that took the group to make this discovery. The use of antimicrobial combinations is not a new concept. Infections such as tuberculosis, endocarditis and chronic viral infections (HIV, hepatitis B/C) are routinely treated with combinations as the standard of care. Antibiotics administered in combination may have an antibacterial effect “greater than the sum of their parts”. However, the use of antibiotics in combination to treat either multi- or pan-drug resistant (PDR) bacterial infections poses significant problems. Enhanced activity can be readily shown in vitro with a myriad of combinations of drugs against a variety of organisms (4-6). Pentamidine, however, is not a traditional antibiotic. The drug is widely used in the treatment of parasitic and fungal infections, but not as an agent for the treatment of common bacterial infections. Why then has pentamidine recently been identified as a drug that could be used to treat MDR bacteria with acquired colistin resistance?

Why pentamidine?

An early step in the pathway that ultimately led to this discovery was the observation that when incubated at low temperatures, Escherichia coli became susceptible to the glycopeptide antibiotic vancomycin (7). This was unexpected as vancomycin is a narrow spectrum antibiotic, usually effective only against Gram-positive bacteria. Unlike Gram-negatives, Gram-positive bacteria lack an outer membrane rendering them susceptible to a number of large hydrophilic drugs including vancomycin. The outer membrane of Gram-negative organisms like E. coli is usually an effective barrier against these drugs.

In an effort to elucidate why temperature would have this effect, the researchers screened a library of E. coli mutants, for those able to retain resistance to vancomycin under cold stress. Surprisingly many of the mutations were in genes responsible for the synthesis of components of the Gram-negative outer membrane. This implied that cold stress altered the outer membrane, making it more permeable to vancomycin. The researchers then hypothesized that by screening for molecules able to restore susceptibility to vancomycin at low temperatures they would identify compounds that would affect outer membrane integrity and thus sensitise resistant cells to other antibiotics. Of 1,440 molecules tested, three compounds; benzalkonium chloride, diminazene and pentamidine, were found to have these effects on E. coli. Pentamidine was selected for further investigation.

What is pentamidine?

Pentamidine is an aromatic diamidine drug. It has activity against a number of microorganisms including protozoa (Trypanosoma brucei, Leishmania spp., and Babesia spp.) and fungi (Pneumocystis jirovecii) (8). Diamidines were investigated during the 1940’s and 1950’s as potential antibacterial compounds (9,10), but were seldom used clinically due to adverse side effects and the abundance of other antimicrobials that were then available. Although they have not been widely used as antibacterials they are known to have activity in vitro against a number of bacterial pathogens, including Coxiella burnetii (11), Tropheryma whipplei (12) and Staphylococcus aureus (13). Table 1 shows some reported pentamidine MICs against a range of different bacterial species.

Table 1
Table 1 Reported pentamidine MICs against selected bacteria.
Full table

The mechanism of action of pentamidine remains largely unknown but evidence suggests that it binds nucleic acids with the positively charged amidinium ions directing it towards the negatively charged phosphate backbone. Pentamidine has been shown to bind to the minor groove of DNA (16) and is AT selective, with most efficient binding observed at sites containing runs of 5 or more AT base pairs (17). Pentamidine has also been found to block mitochondrial translation in eukaryotes by binding to tRNA (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) (18).

Stokes and colleagues (3) demonstrated an entirely new mechanism of action accounting for its antimicrobial activity against E. coli. Using atomic force microscopy, they observed undulations in the outer membrane of pentamidine-treated E. coli cells, suggesting direct interaction of the drug with components of the outer membrane. This was supported by the observation that pentamidine treated cells also released lipopolysaccharide (LPS), suggesting that the integrity of their membrane had been compromised.

As the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria is an impermeable barrier to many antibiotics (19), any disruption may render the cell susceptible to other antibiotic agents, particularly those which are normally excluded. Indeed, this type of synergy has been demonstrated previously with other outer membrane targeting agents such as colistin and polymyxin B (20,21). Interestingly, the addition of Ca2+ or Mg2+ antagonised the low temperature activity of vancomycin on E. coli (7). Likewise, pentamidine did not potentiate rifampicin in the presence of elevated Mg2+ concentrations and, moreover, pentamidine activated the PhoPQ system, which responds to Mg2+ starvation (22). These observations suggest that pentamidine may function in a manner similar to polymyxins: disruption of the stability of the outer membrane LPS by interference with the bridging provided by divalent cations.

Synergy against a variety of Gram-negative pathogens was demonstrated when pentamidine was combined with rifampicin, novobiocin or erythromycin, again representing types of drugs usually used for treating Gram-positive bacteria. Notably the combinations were not effective against Proteus or Morganella species. The reason for this has yet to be determined although these species are considered intrinsically resistant to polymyxins. The combination of pentamidine and rifampicin however was able to overcome the resistance to polymyxins imparted by the mcr-1 gene. This suggests that pentamidine is active via a method which is insensitive to MCR mediated changes to the lipid A moiety of bacterial LPS and might be efficacious as a treatment for organisms with acquired colistin resistance.

Finally, the authors showed that these pentamidine combinations were not just active in vitro, but also in vivo. Pentamidine and novobiocin were able to successfully treat mice with an experimental Acinetobacter baumannii infection, with both colistin-susceptible (100% survival rate) and colistin-resistant (91% survival rate) strains. Furthermore, they demonstrated that the doses of each individual antibiotic could be significantly reduced below the levels required for inhibition in vitro. The doses required to treat these animals were at concentrations which should be safely tolerated by the animals and significantly lower than equivalent human therapeutic doses.

The combination of pentamidine with conventional antibiotics is promising. Obviously translating these laboratory results into clinical outcomes and treatment regimens will require further investigation. Anecdotally, pentamidine may have successfully cleared a S. aureus infection in a patient being treated for a presumed P. jirovecii pneumonia (13). It remains to be seen whether this combination of agents will be well tolerated in humans and improve the outcome of MDR infections.

While the prevalence of antibiotic resistant organisms continues to increase worldwide, the number of drugs we have to treat them remains constant. There is an urgent, and currently unmet, need for new therapeutic agents. The paper of Stokes et al. introduces not only a new potential antibacterial agent, but more importantly highlights a novel approach for identification of new antimicrobials, enabling the repurposing of existing drugs.




Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


  1. Liu YY, Wang Y, Walsh TR, et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis 2016;16:161-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Doern CD. When does 2 plus 2 equal 5? A review of antimicrobial synergy testing. J Clin Microbiol 2014;52:4124-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Stokes JM, MacNair CR, Ilyas B, et al. Pentamidine sensitizes Gram-negative pathogens to antibiotics and overcomes acquired colistin resistance. Nat Microbiol 2017;2:17028. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Betts JW, Phee LM, Hornsey M, et al. In vitro and in vivo activities of tigecycline-colistin combination therapies against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014;58:3541-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Betts JW, Phee LM, Woodford N, et al. Activity of colistin in combination with tigecycline or rifampicin against multidrug-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2014;33:1565-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Wareham DW, Bean DC. In-vitro activity of polymyxin B in combination with imipenem, rifampicin and azithromycin versus multidrug resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii producing OXA-23 carbapenemases. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2006;5:10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Stokes JM, French S, Ovchinnikova OG, et al. Cold stress makes Escherichia coli susceptible to glycopeptide antibiotics by altering outer membrane integrity. Cell Chem Biol 2016;23:267-77. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Sands M, Kron MA, Brown RB. Pentamidine: a review. Rev Infect Dis 1985;7:625-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Wien R, Harrison J, Freeman WA. Diamidines as antibacterial compounds. Br J Pharmacol Chemother 1948;3:211-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Amos H, Vollmayer E. Effect of Pentamidine on the Growth of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 1957;73:172-7. [PubMed]
  11. Minnick MF, Hicks LD, Battisti JM, et al. Pentamidine inhibits Coxiella burnetii growth and 23S rRNA intron splicing in vitro. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2010;36:380-2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Rolain J-M, Fenollar F, Raoult D. In vitro activity of pentamidine against Tropheryma whipplei. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2011;38:545-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Libman MD, Miller MA, Richards GK. Antistaphylococcal activity of pentamidine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990;34:1795-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Maciejewska D, Zabinski J, Kazmierczak P, et al. In vitro screening of pentamidine analogs against bacterial and fungal strains. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2014;24:2918-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Bichowsky-Slomnitzki L. The effect of aromatic diamidines on bacterial growth: I. The mechanism of action. J Bacteriol 1948;55:27-31. [PubMed]
  16. Zołek T, Maciejewska D. Theoretical models of pentamidine analogs activity based on their DNA minor groove complexes. Eur J Med Chem 2010;45:1991-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Fox KR, Sansom CE, Stevens MF. Footprinting studies on the sequence-selective binding of pentamidine to DNA. FEBS Lett 1990;266:150-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Sun T, Zhang Y. Pentamidine binds to tRNA through non-specific hydrophobic interactions and inhibits aminoacylation and translation. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:1654-64. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Delcour AH. Outer membrane permeability and antibiotic resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteomics 2009;1794:808-16.
  20. Gordon NC, Png K, Wareham DW. Potent synergy and sustained bactericidal activity of a vancomycin-colistin combination versus multidrug-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010;54:5316. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Wareham DW, Gordon NC, Hornsey M. In vitro activity of teicoplanin combined with colistin versus multidrug-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011;66:1047-51. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. Monsieurs P, De Keersmaecker S, Navarre WW, et al. Comparison of the PhoPQ regulon in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. J Mol Evol 2005;60:462-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]
doi: 10.21037/jlpm.2017.06.18
Cite this article as: Bean DC, Wareham DW. Pentamidine: a drug to consider re-purposing in the targeted treatment of multi-drug resistant bacterial infections? J Lab Precis Med 2017;2:49.