The analytical and clinical aspects pleural fluid analysis
Editorial

The analytical and clinical aspects pleural fluid analysis

Etiological diagnosis of pleural effusion (PE) remains a challenge for clinicians. Although thoracoscopy has high diagnostic accuracy in patients with undiagnosed PE, it has some limitations, such as invasiveness and the requirement for special training. Pleural fluid analysis shows a high diagnostic accuracy in undiagnosed PE. Compared with thoracoscopy, pleural fluid analysis has the advantages of noninvasiveness, low cost, no requirement for special training, and objectivity. PE can be categorized into transudate and exudate according to the underlying etiology. Transudates are caused by systemic disorders, such as cardiac failure and liver cirrhosis, and exudates are associated with local inflammation of the pleura. The first step in the etiological diagnosis of pleural effusion is separating transudates from exudates. The landmark work in separating exudates and transudate is the Light’s criteria (1). The most common causes of exudate are malignancy, pneumonia, and tuberculous pleurisy. Additional biomarkers beyond the Light’s criteria are needed to verify the underlying causes of exudate. In this special series of pleural fluid analysis, some issues in the pleural fluid analysis were discussed.

The diagnostic accuracy of tumor markers for malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is controversial, and the results from the available studies are always inconsistent. Consequently, systematic reviews and meta-analyses are needed to ascertain the diagnostic accuracy of a given marker. In this special series, the diagnostic accuracy of pleural endostatin for MPE was investigated by a meta-analysis. The results indicate that the endostatin’s diagnostic accuracy for MPE is low (doi: 10.21037/jlpm-20-91).

Machine learning (ML) represents a novel and promising strategy for investigating the diagnostic accuracy of multiple biomarkers (2). A previous study showed that ML improved the diagnostic accuracy of conventional biomarkers for tuberculosis pleural effusion (TPE) (3). In this special series, the diagnostic accuracy of tumor markers for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) was evaluated. Similar to the findings in TPE, results indicated that ML improves the diagnostic accuracy of tumor markers for MPM (doi: 10.21037/jlpm-20-90).

In patients with PE caused by cardiac failure or tuberculosis, pleural biomarkers [e.g., interleukin-27 (4) and natriuretic peptides (5)] show high diagnostic accuracy. By contrast, the available diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers for parapneumonic effusion (PPE) [e.g., C-reactive protein (6) and procalcitonin (7)] is insufficient. In addition, the role of biomarkers in the treatment monitoring of PPE remains controversial. In this special series, a comprehensive review from Lee et al. summarizes the current status of biomarkers in the management of PPE (doi: 10.21037/jlpm-2021-01).

The preanalytical errors in pleural fluid biochemistry remain largely unknown. For example, stored pleural fluid specimens are used in the majority of available studies, but the long-term stability of biomarkers in stored pleural fluid specimens has not been determined. In this special series, Kopcinovic and Culej review the preanalytical factors that can affect the reliability of pleural fluid analysis (doi: 10.21037/jlpm-2021-02).

Taken together, this special series focuses on the analytical and clinical aspects of pleural fluid analysis, with the overall aim of providing novel insights into the field of pleural fluid analysis for both clinicians and laboratory specialists.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Journal of Laboratory and Precision Medicine, for the series “Pleural Fluid Analysis”. This article has undergone external peer review.

Conflicts of Interest: The author has completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jlpm-21-39). The series “Pleural Fluid Analysis” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. Dr. ZDH served as the unpaid Guest Editor of the series and serves as an unpaid Executive Editor of the Journal of Laboratory and Precision Medicine from November 2016 to October 2021.

Ethical Statement: The author is accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Light RW, Macgregor MI, Luchsinger PC, et al. Pleural effusions: the diagnostic separation of transudates and exudates. Ann Intern Med 1972;77:507-13. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. De Bruyne S, Speeckaert MM, Van Biesen W, et al. Recent evolutions of machine learning applications in clinical laboratory medicine. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2021;58:131-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Ren Z, Hu Y, Xu L. Identifying tuberculous pleural effusion using artificial intelligence machine learning algorithms. Respir Res 2019;20:220. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Wang W, Zhou Q, Zhai K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of interleukin 27 for tuberculous pleural effusion: two prospective studies and one meta-analysis. Thorax 2018;73:240-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Han ZJ, Wu XD, Cheng JJ, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Natriuretic Peptides for Heart Failure in Patients with Pleural Effusion: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0134376 [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Li D, Shen Y, Qin J, et al. Diagnostic performance of C-reactive protein for parapneumonic pleural effusion: a meta-analysis. Ann Transl Med 2019;7:1. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. He C, Wang B, Li D, et al. Performance of procalcitonin in diagnosing parapneumonic pleural effusions: A clinical study and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e7829 [Crossref] [PubMed]
Zhi-De Hu

Zhi-De Hu

Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
(Email: hzdlj81@163.com)

Received: 27 July 2021; Accepted: 10 August 2021; Published: 30 October 2021.

doi: 10.21037/jlpm-21-39

doi: 10.21037/jlpm-21-39
Cite this article as: Hu ZD. The analytical and clinical aspects pleural fluid analysis. J Lab Precis Med 2021;6:24.

Download Citation